Icono del sitio La Voz de los Trabajadores

Home

  • El periódico «La Voz de los Trabajadores»: Edición de marzo-abril

    El periódico «La Voz de los Trabajadores»: Edición de marzo-abril

    La guerra de Estados Unidos e Israel contra Irán es una escalada importante en el Medio Oriente que tiene implicaciones peligrosas para los trabajadores de todo el mundo. La brutalidad del asalto imperialista a nivel internacional va junto con el ataque a las libertades civiles por parte del régimen de Trump dentro de Estados Unidos. Esto incluye las operaciones continuas del ICE y la Patrulla Fronteriza, las amenazas a las elecciones de mitad de período de 2026, los retrocesos ambientales que afectan profundamente a la comunidad negra y la brutalidad policial sin control.

    Nuestro editorial en este número nos advierte: «Existe un gran peligro de subestimar la determinación de la élite empresarial estadounidense de llevar adelante esta iniciativa. No podemos confiar en que las sentencias judiciales o las próximas elecciones nos salven. Debemos organizarnos ahora, no solo para realizar manifestaciones masivas y crear redes comunitarias contra la violencia del ICE, sino para encontrar el camino hacia la construcción de un nuevo partido de la clase trabajadora a través del cual podamos organizar nuestra defensa política en todos los planos y todos los días».

    En este número también tenemos artículos sobre los archivos de Epstein y la clase dominante, la huelga de maestros de San Francisco y una reseña del nuevo álbum de U2.

    La edición de marzo-abril de 2026 de nuestro periódico está disponible en formato impreso y en línea como PDF y contiene articulos en ingles y español. ¡Lee hoy mismo el último número de nuestro periódico con una descarga gratuita en PDF! Como siempre, agradecemos cualquier donación que ayude a sufragar los gastos de impresión.

    Haz clic en la imagen para leer el periódico o envíanos un mensaje para recibir una copia impresa:

  • Fighting the plagues of locusts and COVID-19

    Locusts invade a farm field in Kenya. (Sven Torfinn / Oxfam)

    By HEATHER BRADFORD

    In the midst of the COVID-19 pandemic, parts of Africa, South East Asia, and the Middle East are facing another plague. A dangerous outbreak of locusts has ravaged multiple countries since last year, laying waste to crops and threatening millions of people with food insecurity. The current wave of locusts is the second this year and scientists predict it will not be the last.

    Currently, the hardest hit area is East Africa, where in February eight countries faced an initial swarm and now are hit by a second wave of the voracious insects. It is the largest locust infestation in the region in 70 years. This pestilence arose from the perfect storm of climate change, war, austerity, and imperialism.

    The insect behind this scourge is Schistocerca gregaria or the desert locust. Desert locusts are a species of grasshopper found in North Africa, the Middle East, and Indian subcontinent. Owing to accounts in the Bible, Koran, and Ancient Egyptian hieroglyphs, they are the most famous species of locust, though various species are distributed around the world, such as the Australian plague locust, Migratory locust, South American locust, and High Plains locust. Like other grasshoppers, locusts are often solitary, but under the right conditions they become gregarious. In their gregarious phase, they band together in large, devastating swarms—which have plagued humanity for thousands of years.

    Typically, swarming occurs when food becomes abundant due to wet conditions, resulting in a population boom. The perfect conditions for an outbreak of locusts began in 2018 when Cyclone Mekunu struck an area of the Arabian peninsula called the Empty Quarter or Rub’ al Khali, a sand desert that includes portions of Oman, Yemen, United Arab Emirates, and Saudi Arabia. Normally, this area of desert would dry out, controlling locust populations. However, according to a February article in National Public Radio the Empty Quarter was struck by a second cyclone in late 2018 and another in December 2019. PBS NewsHour noted that there were a total of eight cyclones in 2019, an enormous deviation from the annual occurrence of one or zero.

    Prior to a year of flooding and heavy rains, there were three years of drought. Space.com reported that beyond the unusually wet conditions of the Empty Quarter, the Horn of Africa received four times more rain than usual between October and December, in the wettest short wet season in 40 years. These conditions also fostered locust breeding once the insects moved into the region.

    The rare and climate-crisis-driven bombardment of cyclones to an otherwise arid area increased vegetation and resulted in an explosion of the locust population. The Guardian reported that the second cyclone alone resulted in an 8000-fold increase in the locust population. Locusts reproduce with unstoppable speed, as a single female can lay 300 eggs, which hatch in as little as two weeks and take only two additional weeks for larvae to mature and begin reproducing. Once mature, locusts can travel up to 90 miles a day. Their population grows exponentially, increasing 400 times every six months.

    The locusts spread from Yemen, hitting Kenya, Somalia, and Ethiopia the hardest. National Public Radio reported that the locusts crossed the Gulf of Aden last year, arriving first in Somalia and Ethiopia.They were later spotted in Kenya in December 2019, some forming a swarm of over 192 billion insects in a mass three times the size of New York City. The United Nations has cautioned that a swarm the size of ⅓ of a square mile can eat as much food as 35,000 people in one day.

    Economic and social catastrophe

    The Guardian warned that East Africa is currently being hit the hardest, though owing to climate change and war, Yemen has also been hit hard. According to “PBS News Hour,” the latest wave of insects is 20 times larger than the February swarm, owing to heavy rains in March. It is currently planting season in East Africa, and another wave of locusts is expected to hit during June, which is harvest time. Already, 33 million people in the region endure food insecurity.

    The impacts of the infestation are already catastrophic. Al Jazeera reported that a half-million acres of farm land in Ethiopia have been ravaged and 8.5 million Ethopians experience acute food insecurity. As of early April, over 74,000 acres of crops were destroyed, including coffee and tea, which make up 30% of Ethiopia’s exports. In a Los Angeles Times report, Somalia had already lost 100% of staple crops such as corn and sorghum loss by January. In Kenya, 30% of pastureland has been lost, and as of mid-March, the pests had destroyed 2000 tons of food in the country. Over 173,000 acres of cropland in Kenya has been decimated, including corn, bean,and cowpea crops. Agriculture accounts for 25% of Kenya’s economy.

    Ethiopia, Somalia, Kenya, Djibouti, Eritrea, Tanzania, Sudan, South Sudan, and Uganda are among the African countries currently under attack by locust swarms. As of late March, swarms were forming elsewhere in Pakistan, India, Saudi Arabia, and Iran. Some 140,000 acres of crops have been destroyed in Pakistan. The swarms are expected to hit Pakistan’s cotton industry hard, as the textile industry is the country’s largest employer and accounts for 60% of exports. In Pakistan, it is the worst locust outbreak since 1993.

    Efforts to stop the spread of locusts have been hampered by COVID-19 and the social problems already facing these countries. Locusts are usually controlled with pesticides, which are either applied by aircraft that target adult locusts through aerial spraying or by ground crews who target eggs and young locusts that can not yet fly. But closed borders and a global slowdown of shipping have slowed the transportation of pesticides. Reuters reported that in Somalia, an order of pesticides expected in late March was delayed.

    Surveillance of locust swarms is conducted by helicopters, but lockdowns have made helicopters harder to secure. In Kenya, helicopter pilots from South Africa have had to quarantine for 14 days before they could begin work. On the economic side, 60% of Kenya’s GDP went to servicing debt before COVID-19 and locusts hit. The economic impact of both plagues makes this debt even more punishing than it was before. As of 2017, nineteen African countries were spending more than 60% of their GDP on debt.

    Somaliland, a self-declared republic in Somalia, has no resources to fight locusts. Keith Cressman of the Food and Agriculture Organization (FAO) of the UN said that South Sudan and Uganda also lack programs for outbreaks. In South Sudan, 200,000 people live in UN camps, already in close conditions and at risk of food insecurity and COVID-19. Cressman noted that social distancing makes it hard to train new people to tackle the problem, as this involves gathering people together in classrooms.

    Despite lockdowns and curfews, workers tackling the locust outbreak have been given exemptions for travel. Thus far, nearly 600,000 acres of land have been treated with pesticides and 740 people have been trained to do ground locust control. The FAO has obtained $111.1 million of $153.2 million it requested to fight the swarms. Because most of the world is focused on fighting COVID-19, additional aid to combat the locusts has been hard to come by.

    Dangers of pesticide use

    Pesticides are an imperfect solution to the problem. When the pesticides are applied, villages must be warned to move livestock. According to a Kenyan news source, Daily Nation, one of the pesticides that the FAO recommends is Diazinon, which the U.S. banned from residential use in 2004. The pesticide works by affecting the nervous system of insects. However, human exposure can result in symptoms such as watery eyes, stomach pain, vomiting, coughing, and runny nose. Longer exposure can cause seizures, rapid heart rate, and coma. The Pesticide Action Network (Panna) warned that it can be harmful to children and can cause birth defects.

    A Pakistani news source named lambda cyhalothrin, chlorpyrifos, and bifenthrin as pesticides against locusts and cited worries that the chemicals could impact drinking water, cause respiratory problems, and irritate skin. Ground crews responsible for spraying the pesticides may be at risk. In the face of the COVID-19 outbreak and strained supplies of PPE, workers may not have necessary protections.

    According to Science, the FAO has also used biopesticides in the form of fungus in Somalia. An article in the Zimbabwe news source, The Herald expressed concern over both pesticides and biopesticides, which mainly rely on spores from Metarhizium sp. The spores may not be as effective because they work best in moderate temperatures and high humidity, conditions that are not common in the areas most impacted by the locusts. The spores take 14 days to take effect and are mainly used against young locusts. While it is unknown if this is the current practice, the French research program LUBILOSA, which developed the fungus, suggested that the spores should be dissolved in paraffin or diesel, both of which are carcinogens.

    Pesticides and biopesticides also risk harming other insects. Linseed oil and neem may have some potential as safer, natural insecticides. Likewise, The Locust Lab of Arizona State University has found that locusts prefer carbohydrate-rich foods and lower carb crops may deter locusts. For instance, locusts do not care for millet. In the face of the immediate, cataclysmic attack of locusts and the risk of famine, research into less harmful alternatives is something for future exploration.

    Socialists call for long-term prevention measures

    A socialist solution to tackle locust outbreaks should begin with prevention. Unusually wet conditions and the bizarre frequency of cyclones last year was a catalyst for the current crisis. To stop the climate crisis, capitalism must end. Anything short of this will only result in more frequent and severe natural disasters and less predictable weather patterns. The Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change predicts that Africa will experience a 20% increase in cyclones, coupled with 20% decrease in precipitation. These conditions will make future locust swarms more likely.

    Droughts, mudslides, floods, and infectious diseases are all predicted to increase with climate change. Agriculture that relies on water resources could drop 50% in some countries, and wheat production could disappear by 2080. Climate change will only make the continent more food insecure at the cost of countless lives.

    Another immediate concern to socialists should be organizing against imperialist wars. The locusts spread from Yemen, which could have played a crucial role in halting their migration towards Africa. Yemen was in no position to tackle this problem because it has been beleaguered by a brutal war lasting over five years between the U.S.-supported Saudi-led coalition and Houthi fighters. The country has suffered through outbreaks of cholera, diphtheria, measles, dengue fever, and now COVID-19. According to Human Rights Watch, there have been two million cases of cholera since 2016.

    Last fall, when the locust population exploded, 10 million people in Yemen needed food aid and were already at risk of starvation. When the swarms appeared, people in Yemen actually began to collect them in bags, sell them, and eat them. Locusts are eaten by people outside of starvation conditions, but after experiencing the worst famine in the world in 100 years, they were a welcome bounty to some.

    The war has cost at least 90,000 fatalities, and the U.S. is complicit in the destruction. The U.S. has provided weapons and logistical support to Saudi Arabia and its allies, which have conducted over 20,000 airstrikes, of which ⅓ were against military targets. Hospitals, ports, mosques, and schools are among the civilian targets. Prior to the war, the Ministry of Agriculture was usually able to control outbreaks of locusts. At the present time, control of locusts is divided by government and Houthi forces, but both lack the resources to adequately address the problem.

    Locust infestations must be caught early and perhaps with better infrastructure or the plethora of other social problems faced in Yemen, it might have been addressed more effectively. Several of the countries now facing the desolation of locusts have similarly been destabilized by wars. This hampers their ability to organize a response.

    All of the impacted countries have been saddled with debt and stunted by their economic dependency to wealthier nations. The plague hits the economies of these nations particularly hard because of their high debt and dependence on agricultural exports such as coffee, tea, and cotton. The reason these countries lack the medical infrastructure to combat COVID-19 and means to fight locust swarms is a direct result of colonization and the subsequent export economies, austerity, and debt that maintain dependency. Africa will always be a continent of crisis as long as hefty profits can be extracted from it.

    In this moment, all international debt should be forgiven and aid given unconditionally to prevent the threat of starvation. But, development of impoverished countries cannot happen within the framework of capitalism. The wealth that has been taken from Africa should be reinvested with a commitment to build infrastructure and capital based upon relationships of solidarity over dependency.

    Locusts are often imagined as an act of God, but they exist in a material reality like everything else. The reality is that the climate conditions of the planet are increasingly unstable. One-hundred-year floods, 100-year storms, and even 100-year locust hatchings are becoming frighteningly normal. The ability to mobilize resources to alleviate hunger and fight these pests is obstructed by war, economic dependency, and a global pandemic that already demands what few resources might be marshalled.

    In a brighter, socialist future, this insect that has tormented humans for thousands of years might again be minimized to a solitary grasshopper, controlled by sustainable and diverse agricultural practices, early detection, and stable climate conditions. In the case of a swarm, food would be abundant enough to be shared, rather than left to rot in the anarchistic, false abundance of capitalism.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • Mumia health scare hoax: Empty the prisons!

    March to free Mumia Abu-Jamal in Philadelphia in April 2019. (Sal Mastriano / Socialist Resurgence)

    By JOHN LESLIE

    On April 15, word went out among supporters of political prisoner Mumia Abu-Jamal that Mumia had been taken to a hospital when exhibiting symptoms indicating COVID-19. In a telephone conversation on the morning of April 16 Mumia said, “I am fine, I am not hospitalized. …what I need is freedom.” It’s clear now that the rumor of Mumia’s “illness” was a cruel hoax by a prison employee.

    A press release from Mobilization4Mumia states: “The whole incident adds to a long list of lies and misinformation by the PA DOC since Mumia was first unjustly incarcerated in 1982. Why did a person at the SCI Mahanoy Superintendent’s Office on an official phone tell a concerned advocate that Mumia was being hospitalized with COVID-19?

    “How would you react if someone in authority falsely told you your elderly relative was sick with COVID-19? As a concerned person, you would be outraged. So were the participants in the April 16 virtual press conference.”

    The spread of COVID-19 through prisons is a threat to the health and lives of the incarcerated. The Pennsylvania Department of Corrections reports that more than 100 guards throughout the system have tested positive while 17 prisoners have tested positive at the Phoenix facility. While prisoners are being quarantined and time outside of their cells is limited, the measures are not adequate. With only limited testing, the potential for a disastrous result is great. The PA DOC has been slow to release incarcerated people, with only about 474 released so far. Pennsylvania has more than 95,000 prisoners.

    The April 9 death of Rudolph Sutton, the first Pennsylvania prisoner to die from COVID-19, was just a few days before prosecutors announced their intention to review his case. Imprisoned for 30 years, Sutton had maintained his innocence. More recently, witnesses had come forward with information that bolstered his case for exoneration.

    Additionally, Yvonne Harris, who was serving an 18-month sentence in the Philadelphia County jail, was the first prisoner in the county prison to die from the coronavirus. Of the more than 4,000 prisoners in the county jail, 53 have tested positive and of those 3 are hospitalized.

    The frame-up of Mumia

    Mumia Abu-Jamal, a former member of the Black Panther Party and award-winning journalist, was railroaded into prison by cops and a corrupt District Attorney’s office for the 1981 murder of police officer Daniel Faulkner.

    The Philadelphia DA’s office is infamous for biased prosecutions and suppression of evidence in death-penalty and other cases. The DA’s office was exposed for a 1986 training video that taught assistant DAs how to keep Blacks off juries. In Mumia’s case, crime-scene photos taken by photojournalist Pedro Polokoff showed cops holding guns taken in evidence with their bare hands, and showed the hat of deceased Officer Daniel Faulkner placed on top of Mumia’s brother Billy Cook’s VW, though it appears on the sidewalk in the official police photos. The ballistics evidence was questionable.

    An international mass movement grew in response to Mumia’s case. The movement’s steadfast determination to save Mumia’s life helped win a reversal of the death sentence, which was commuted to a life sentence. But although Mumia’s death sentence was overturned, he was later struck by a series of potentially life-threatening illnesses. It became clear that the Department of Corrections was neglecting symptoms of diabetes. He experienced chronic fatigue, painful itching, and eczema, which worsened when doctors prescribed a topical ointment. In 2015, Mumia was hospitalized for diabetes and in the same year initiated legal action to receive treatment for Hepatitis C. It took a two-year struggle to get life-saving medication for Mumia‘s Hepatitis C.

    Mumia’s lawyers made significant progress in recent years challenging Mumia’s conviction and a new appeals process under the Williams v. Pennsylvania decision.

    Terrance Williams had been convicted and sentenced to death for robbery and murder. Ron Castille, the chief justice of the Pennsylvania Supreme Court, had been the district attorney of Philadelphia when Williams was tried, convicted, and sentenced to death. When Williams appealed, his attorneys asked that Justice Castille recuse himself from the case, given his previous role as prosecutor. Castille refused. The U.S. Supreme Court later ruled that a prosecutor who later becomes a judge should recuse himself or herself if asked to hear an appeal in a case they had prosecuted.

    The situation faced by Terrance Williams mirrors Castille’s refusal to recuse himself in Mumia’s case. On Dec. 27, 2018, Philadelphia Common Pleas Court Judge Leon Tucker ruled in favor of Mumia Abu-Jamal, holding that the actions of Judge Castille had demonstrated a “lack of impartiality” and “the appearance of bias.”

    Attorney Judith Ritter explained at a Sept. 28, 2019, public meeting that the ruling referred to the discovery of a 1990 letter from Castille, when he was the Philadelphia DA, to Governor Bob Casey, urging him to sign death warrants for death-row inmates “to send a clear and dramatic message to all police killers that the death penalty in Pennsylvania actually means something.”

    An urgent situation

    Supporters of Mumia’s freedom have been fighting to bring Mumia home for years. This task is even more urgent now that COVID-19 threatens the lives of prisoners everywhere. We must demand that Mumia and all prisoners be freed—now. From county to state to federal systems, the prison doors must be thrown open. Free Mumia and all political prisoners! Free them all!

    COMING EVENTS:

    https://www.eventbrite.com/e/teach-in-us-empire-v-political-prisoners-tickets-102522325034

    This teach-in is part of a series of events called “Rise Up and Resist” to celebrate Mumia’s 66th birthday. Other events include:

    April 23: Press Conference (speakers tba)

    April 25: Mumia Libre: An Instagram Live Dance Party

    4/26: Poetry In Motion: A 24 hour Reading of the work of Mumia Abu-Jamal

    More info: bringmumiahome@gmail.com

    #freemumia, #freepoliticalprisoners, #freeemall, #66sitesofresistance

    Cosponsored by: Common Notionsthe Campaign to Bring Mumia HomeMobilization 4 Mumia and The International Concerned Family and Friends of Mumia Abu-Jamal (ICFFMAJ).

  • The Coronavirus and the Wretched of the Earth

    The pandemic and its consequences hit many countries hard. But it doesn’t hit all the social sectors equally. At these catastrophic times, imperialist capitalism shows us, in wide way and in all its cruelty, the deep and growing inequality created.
    By Alejandro Iturbe, April 2, 2020
    Starting with the most basic needs: drinkable tap water, essential for washing hands and periodically drinking, as precautionary measure. On March 22nd, International Water Day, the UN informed that 40% of the global population don’t have access to proper water.
    In a article recently published, the biologist and Argentinian investigator Guilhermo Folguera explain some of the causes[1] : a) in the urban zones, especially in the big cities, the poorest sectors, that were part of this urbanization, are in areas where it hasn’t such constructions to provide them and were never carried out later; b) the action of the urban pollution and the industrial waste on water sources and streams, without treatment that makes it not drinkable before consumption; c ) the action of economic activity  (that are encouraged by the bourgeois governments without any checking) like agrobusiness, mega mining, and fracking, that not only use amounts of water resources but also deteriorate their quality and contaminate it, and d ) the imperialist capitalism that stopped considering the water as a essential natural resource, that was supposed to be free and available right, and now consider it a commercial good, a commodity to make profits. As the president of Nestlé, Peter Brabeck-Letmathe expressed: ” it is necessary to privatize water supply”[2].
    This deep analysis, express itself in many human beings of flesh and bone that are marginalized in slums, miserable villages and others marginal neighborhoods in poor conditionsIn those type of neighborhoods, for your conditions, a first case not detected can expand itself really fast. Like in the famous Cidade de Deus in Rio de Janeiro (where the first case of infection have already been detected).[3] or in Cabin 9 (Rosario, Argentine) neighborhood, where the residents must leave the area to get water because the groundwater is contaminated. Yolanda Ruiz, member of neighborhood forums, said: “The only solution to us remains going to the water tank to fill the gallons that we will use to cook and drink. Unfortunately, we expose ourselves to infection since we must form a long line to get water and we can have contact with the at-risk population and the elderly”[4].
    The situation is even worse, among the marginals of the marginals: the homeless. José, who lives in the streets of São Paulo, talks about running water: “On the streets there isn’t nothing like that. They say that we have to wash our hands, but where? We get ourselves washed with the water that is collected from the rain” [5]. Not to mention hand sanitizer which is considered an out-of-reach “luxury” except when, very sporadically, it’s offered for some nearby church.
    Meanwhile, the “rich and famous” show off their “quarantine” full of luxuries and pleasures in their homes with swimming-pool (using the water that is missing in other places) in the private neighborhoods, surrounded by security that isolates them from the world even though the media display them sordidly.[6]
    An extreme case of this exhibitionism was Marcelo Cibelli, Argentine television and sport businessman, who traveled on a private plane and went to spend quarantine with his family in his luxurious Esquel house, in a paradisiacal area in Patagonia, surrounded by lakes and mountains.[7]
    “The curse of labor”
    Meanwhile the “rich and famous” live from the exploitation of workers and/or of their interests, many workers are in conflict between the cruel option to go to work and expose themselves or don’t go to work and starve. This contradiction is especially hard for those informal workers who are unable to fight for paid leaves or succeed in making companies guarantee basic health conditions.
    It’s the case of the rural pawns, like fruits pickers from the Alto Vale do Rio Negro (in Patagonia, Argentina), an activity that is free from Alberto Fernández’ emergency decree and whose businessmen do not comply with any of the health and sanitation measures, in the face of absence of unions or official regulation. An article about the case shows a picture in which workers are taken to work huddled in a wooden vehicle towed by a tractor [8]. It’s not different at all of their usual work conditions, but now, in the midst of the pandemic, it ends up being a criminal employer attitude.
    Those same conditions would be “accepted” by many women from Rosario who can’t leave their houses to their daily informal housework workday with which used to financially support their own families.
    Or to thousands of street vendors, which on daily basis, moving around the big cities, selling goods or homemade food. There is no alternative income for them due to customers absence and governments advice to stay at home. “If I don’t die from this virus, I’ll starve”, said José Maria, a homemade ice cream salesman, at a healthcare unity in Lapa, São Paulo.[9]
    The same situation takes place in the United States, the richest country in the world and a capitalist “example”. With 140 million people who can’t pay their own bills[10], the country has the most expensive healthcare system for workers and their families. The U.S. also has an education system that teaches in a individualistic framing. The country is about to become the third country in the world to suffer from this pandemic, which New York is the epicenter[11].
    At the bottom
    One or two degrees below the street vendors, are thousands of prisoners that are crowded in Latin America and world’s jails, as an extreme expression of the capitalist decline. Faced with the risk of being infected or even die, the prisoners started some violent riots as those that took place in Argentina, Brazil and Colombia, many of them repressed in a bloody way[12]. Some of them fled in large scale[13]. There are news about tension in Egypt and Sri Lanka as well[14]l.
    Only the abandoned elderly who died in nursing homes or those who died alone in their own houses could be considered as in a worst situation, as happened in the Spanish State, informed by BBC[15].
    More privileges
    The wealthy and famous’s privileges are not limited by the conditions they spent quarantine, but also extended to ways of detecting possible infection. For the ordinary people, it’s quite hard to be tested by a reliable test, because governments and public health centers does not invest money on those and do it hardly ever, although it’s considered a indispensable action to stop the pandemic and assure social isolation measures are effective[16]
    However, the wealthy and famous does not have this problem. It’s been guaranteed coronavirus tests for NBA basketball players by their own sports companies, while others celebrities, politicians and billionaires have already been tested, buying it from private laboratories[17].
    The same privileges are used as a way to escape quarantine, even when they place themselves and many others in unsafe situation. Luca Singerman, an Argentinian young rugby  player, economist and college professor Pablo Singerman’s son, arrived from Holland. At Uruguay, infection symptoms were detected and he was hospitalized at Montevideo, ran away and boarded in a Buquebús company’s ship compelling 500 members of the crew and passengers to stay isolated inside the ship when it arrived at Buenos Aires[18].
    Another example is from a Jujuy’s supreme court judge, in Argentina, that arrived in Miami and tried to escape quarantine by presenting an habeas corpus appeal, claiming she was part of a exemption agreement signed by the president Alberto Fernández, that speaks about people who occupy high positions in all three powers of provincial and national states[19].
    Preparing for possible social explosions
    It’s also true that some social sectors and workers does not comply with the mandatory social isolation. However, at least in Argentina, for those groups military or police force’s repression are applied, including arrests. Thousands of people were arrested in Argentina due to declared state of siege[20].
    This situation it’s not about fighting the virus with over precaution. Behind the scene, there is fear that the pandemic situation, the crisis effects’ depth and inequality sacrifice proof combined creates conditions for a social explosion at the most affected areas.
    Several mayors predict this scenario and accuse “left-wing segments” of promoting it. The preparation to avoid it includes the formation of the “crisis committees” with the president endorsement that comes up with palliative measures. In case it’s not effective, the government have the real intention of increased repression[21]. This is the current situation in Argentina, and a latent situation in other countries.
    Some conclusions
    The capitalism’s scourge was not created by the coronavirus pandemic, but it exposes and deepens it. The bourgeoisie and their governments, placed on a rotten system, fight the pandemic in a limited and ineffective way. They also use class criteria, which they protect themselves and their profits and exploitation.
    Their actions and speeches are full of hypocrisy. Junior Durski, a Brazilian businessman, owner of a restaurant chain, expressed the true intention of a significant segment when said “5000 or 7000 deaths can’t stop Brazil”[22]. The majority of those deaths will be obviously of workers and the poor.

  • Release from Prison: A Necessary Policy In Times of Coronavirus

    There were rebellions in prison units in Italy, leaving at least six dead; in Colombia, there were 23 dead in 17 prison riots; there were several revolts in Jordan and Israel as well; 1,379 inmates escaped after several outbreaks in five prison units in the State of San Pablo.
    By: Américo Gomes,  Mar 27, 2020
    These revolts happened after announcements of the measures that would be applied due to the pandemic were made, among these measures: suspension of relatives’ and lawyers’ visits and the suspension of prisoners’ early release due to good behavior; supposedly justified under the pretense that it’s to avoid the propagation of the virus. All of which is completely unjustifiable because of the overcrowding, lousy sanitary conditions (many with no water), with low quality nourishment and doubtful handling. These elements are all virus propagators.
    Lousy prison conditions created by capitalism and the bourgeois State whose main objective is repression and coercion of the working class.
    So much so that the few bourgeois prisoners, those accused of not only fraud, theft, and corruption but also of all types of crimes, are in pavilions or special cells, or under house arrest in their mansions, with all the luxuries and commodities.
    Prison as a means of control over the proletariate by the bourgeoisie
    The prison system is a fundamental element in the repression apparatus used by the bourgeois class against the working class. It’s not just the death and murders that bring terror and fear to the class, but the ill treatment, rudeness, torture that they are subjected to in the prison regime that are part of the framework built by the bourgeois repression regimes.
    Bourgeois national and international laws, dictate that prisons should serve to rehabilitate and not to punish. When in actuality, the real objective is to penalize and punish, with overcrowding and abandonment, low quality food, lack of basic cleaning supplies, lack of vaccination plans, lack of job training schools, lack of education, and of recreation centers (such as gyms, sports areas and libraries). The cuts to national funding to pay international banking only make matters worse.
    The pandemic is going to eradicate the most vulnerable sectors
    There were over thirty prison riots in Italy, where the prison system has an overpopulation of more than 10,000 people, reaching more than 10 prisoners per cell, with precarious sanitary conditions and propagation of infections and diseases. They suspended “work permits”, parents’ visits and access to social workers and volunteers. Non official numbers indicate that these riots added up to fifteen people dead.
    As degrading as it is, the Italian prison system doesn’t reach the point at which the Brazilian prison system is in, which surpassed the barbarism limit, having the third highest prison population in the world. The cells are just a few square meters in area, are completely full, with little to no ventilation; in some penitentiaries, washing your hands is almost impossible, it’s a privilege.
    The coronavirus in these prisons will extend its reach at an incredible speed; it’ll be impossible to contain its dissemination in a population that, even today, is plagued by various illnesses, such as AIDS and tuberculosis, increasing the lethality of the coronavirus. Magnified by the lousy nutritional condition of the inmates and the precariousness of the health services.
    To fight against these conditions, the bourgeois governments’ proposals are, as always, more repression; that will only amplify the situation and significantly magnify the internal tensions and consequently, the risk of rebellions and jailbreaks; these are: visitor restrictions, suspension of early releases and punishment increases.
    A preview of this happened in various prisons in several countries around the world in the last few days.
    23 Dead in Bogotá
    A protest against the lousy prison conditions in the Modelo de Bogotá Prison ended with a massacre, leaving 23 dead and 81 wounded, carried out by the police and the Colombian Army on March 22nd.  The massacre was followed by the silence of the prison authorities and the federal government, but the silence was broken by the inmates’ families and human rights organizations.
    This proves that, in this “war” against the coronavirus, the death of the most impoverished sectors of society is deemed as “collateral damage” by the bourgeoisie.
    Death as Collateral Damage
    In Brazil, this barbaric situation has sparked debate even between sectors of the bourgeoisie. Jurists of the STF (Federal Supreme Court) presented some measures in the sense to decrease prison populations. Human Rights organizations proposed granting parole or house arrest to elderly detainees or to those presenting illnesses that can aggravate a COVID-19 infection, as well as pregnant or nursing women. However, the Justice Minister, Sérgio Moro, proving that he’s sticking with the guidelines of Bolsonaro’s government, in what public health and general contempt of the most impoverished regards, claims that the government pretends to vaccinate inmates against the common cold (sic) “to avoid confusion” between the flu infections and that he’s absolutely against releasing any type of prisoners, so as to not “excessively jeopardize” the general population.
    This positioning is so absurd that even bourgeois governments and dictatorships are releasing prisoners, like Iran, where they liberated nearly 85,000 inmates, among them political prisoners (maybe a dozen), the majority with sentences below five years. Trump’s American government just released over 6,000 prisoners who were serving time in federal prisons for non-violent, drug-related crimes. Moro and Bolsonaro, however, decided not to follow the lead of their mentor, Trump.
    Some proposals
    What these governments are doing is not only insufficient and plain wrong; from the bourgeois humanitarian point of view it is inhumane, since they in fact want to introduce the death penalty in the prison system, because they believe they are collateral losses of lives.
    We’ve been taught to believe that there are many dangerous criminals in the penitentiaries (which, there are) and that these must be in confinement, apart from society. These governments take advantage of this general understanding that workers have of the prison system to generalize this vision for the whole lot of detainees.
    It just so happens that in Brazil, for example, of the more than 800,000 inmates, 41% do not have a court conviction, are under 30 years of age and are first time offenders.
    There is suspicion of contamination in various prison units, all of them overcrowded (like the one in Tremembé, whose unit I holds 2,084 prisoners but has capacity for 1,284), where the inmates are not subjected to any type of test. The prisoners that rebel or protest against this situation are punished with cuts to food and water.
    As an emergency measure, in times of crisis, pre-trial detentions should be revoked for all inmates accused of non-violent crimes. These prisoners should await their trials in freedom.
    Besides, those condemned for non-violent crimes with small sentences, should be placed under parole, house arrest or provisional release. This is to say fraudsters, petty theft assailants, and small drug traffickers. The majority of whom are poor, black, immigrants and live in the peripheries.
    This excludes those who were convicted of violent crimes, such as larceny, theft followed by death, kidnappings and murders; violence against women, as well as crimes of the militia, hired assassins, State agents, torturers or those who have committed crimes against humanity.
    Alongside these measures, a containment plan of the epidemic must be put in place in the prison system, supervised by state organizations, human rights organizations and the inmates’ relatives.
    These are minimal, emergency measures compared to the catastrophic, barbaric situation we are living, carried out by the mess and capitalist anarchism that always put their profits first.
    It is not fair that capitalism, which is responsible for the propagation of this terrible pandemic, will take advantage of it to eliminate common inmates for petty crimes, who they keep confined to these prisons in subhuman conditions.
    The fight for life must be put in place urgently in the frame of a socialist revolution, to free the world of this succession of horrors that capitalism has to offer to all of humanity.
    Article published in: www.pstu.org.br
    Translation: Anastasia Ransewak

  • COVID & prisoners: ‘Hit the horns! Free them all!’ 

    Damaris Colón and her son, who is incarcerated.

    By JOSH BLANCHFIELD

    “Hit the horns!” This has been the signal of resistance to rows and rows of cars in recent days outside of Connecticut Governor Ned Lamont’s mansion in the historic west end of Hartford. What has followed along Prospect Avenue outside the mansion has been a cacophony of resistance against the conditions of prisoners trapped during the COVID-19 pandemic.

    Activists across Connecticut have quickly adapted to the pandemic by organizing a series of car-based demonstrations outside the mansion to bring the plight of prisoners directly to Governor Lamont’s door. Between April 6 and April 12, three of these car actions clogged the street outside the mansion demanding the release of prisoners.

    “I know this is a hard decision but please give a chance to my son. He has learned his lesson. He has plans to go back to college and get his life together. If the governor gives my son a chance, we will be forever grateful. I don’t mind if my son is under house arrest, I just want him to be safe,” says Damaris Colon, the mother of a 19-year-old inmate.

    With Lamont’s continual dodging of the coalition and families, a multipronged plan was released. The plan, developed by a coalition of prison reform groups and families of the incarcerated, calls for the rapid decarceration of Connecticut prisoners, including 2416 inmates with less than 1 year on their sentences, 1556 people in prison for technical violations, the 5314 up for parole, and 3089 who aren’t even sentenced. It also calls for the immediate halt to transfers to Northern Correctional, according to the statement released by the coalition, “The conditions of confinement at Northern C.I. are deeply inhumane and are intrinsically punitive.”

    This coalition has joined forces to fight for the release of prisoners trapped by the pandemic. It includes the Katal Center for Health, Equity and Justice, Stop Solitary CT, One Standard of Justice, CT Bail Fund, and Second Chance Educational Alliance. The coalition has also found solidarity in Unidad Latina en Acción CT, which is also fighting for the release of those detained during the pandemic.

    “No Justice, No Peace! Compassion and Release!”

    The demands are clear: Governor Lamont must immediately release incarcerated groups from Connecticut jails and prisons due to COVID-19. Unfortunately, Lamont has refused to take the action needed to keep inmates safe. In fact, the situation is worsening as ill prisoners are being transferred to the state’s only maximum-security prison, Northern Correctional Institution in Somers. According to the state, the maximum-security prison has the infrastructure recommended by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention to isolate inmates with the virus. Over 35 inmates have been transferred to Northern.

    According to activists, though, transfers to Northern are also targeting prisoners resisting their treatment during the pandemic, including those engaging in hunger strikes and work stoppages. “People are being crucified for speaking up. They should have a right to not have to work or stay in a place where they know they are going to be infected,” Barbara Fair of Stop Solitary CT told protesters gathered outside the mansion on Easter Sunday.

    It is clear to families of those incarcerated and the coalition that Connecticut is headed in the wrong direction in its treatment of the sick and the conditions that are putting all prisoners at risk.

    “Some correctional officers are not using masks. They are all at risk, even the nurses. The doctors only pass by and look in cells. How can they tell if anyone is sick?” says Colon. She says her son calls her and tries to update her on the pandemic situation in prison. “I’m so scared because for my son, when he was younger, he was exposed to pneumonia as a child. He suffered all his life from ADHD, persistent depressive disorder and with this COVID-19. … Governor Lamont just is not caring about any incarcerated people.”

    In response to the action outside his door, the governor told the constituents to “call me” but sent them to a phone line that didn’t work and went directly to 211. Groups then demanded a meeting with the governor, which was scheduled for last Thursday but was then cancelled by Lamont’s team and rescheduled for Monday, April 13—making families wait again. Lamont and his team then proceeded to cancel that meeting as well. Meanwhile, the number of COVID-19 cases in Connecticut prisons and jails increases for both incarcerated people and correctional staff. Lamont’s delays mean people in jails and prisons remain in danger.

    Late Monday night, news broke that Connecticut’s first incarcerated victim of COVID-19 had been identified. He had been approved in March for discretionary release into the community, but a home sponsor could not be found.

    The coalition is clear about who can reduce the harm: Governor Lamont, “You have the power to fix this crisis with a stroke of a pen. Do so.”

    For more information and a list of the coalition’s demands, see:

    http://socialistresurgence.org/wp-content/uploads/2020/04/dce72-coviddecarceration_coalitionpolicypaper_4-13-2020.pdf

     

     

  • Coronavirus and the Chinese Economy

    The coronavirus pandemic has hit the Chinese economy hard, with setbacks in key indicators not seen for decades. What will happen in the coming months? How does this current reality and its dynamics impact world economy?
    By Alejandro Iturbe,   Mar/31/2020

    Recently, a BBC article reported: “China’s National Bureau of Statistics reported record declines in industrial production, retail or investment in fixed assets, which added to other indexes, anticipate a collapse across multiple domains. ”[…]
    “Industrial production (which measures manufacturing, mining and utilities activity) fell 13.5% year-on-year, the first contraction since January 1990. Retail sales, a key indicator of the state of consumption in the second economy worldwide, fell by 20.5% year-on-year, the biggest collapse since recorded. While investment in fixed assets –which reflects expenses in items that include infrastructure, property, machinery and equipment– fell by 24.5% year-on-year, another record decline ”[…]“ According to Trivium research firm’s National Business Index, up  until March 16 the Chinese economy was operating at 69.5% of normal production ”[1].
    The unemployment rate rose from 5.2% last December to 6.3% in February 2020, the highest level since publication of official records [2].
    The Chinese economy hasn’t had such a setback since 1976, when the Deng Xiao Ping leadership defined the beginning of the capitalist restoration process. Today, the economy is ten times bigger than in those years and it has a much more significant weight in the world economy.
    The causes
    Before the pandemic, the Chinese economy grew 6.1% in 2019, the lowest rate in three decades; It is considered that due to the combination of various elements, a growth in Chinese GDP below 7% represents a “crisis” situation. Meaning the economy was in a “slow crisis” [3].
    On this already weakened basis, the measures adopted to face and stop the coronavirus outbreak (between 45 and 50 days of virtual paralysis), affected both production and consumption, which caused an abrupt fall in Chinese economy in the first quarter of 2020, as we saw in previous figures. “Private consumption is the most affected. Shops are closed, or open with reduced hours, and leisure activities have disappeared. Auto sales, for example, plummeted more than 80% in February ”[4].
    The Xi Jinping government kept trying to strengthen the domestic market with products manufactured in China, reducing the weight of exports. This situation hinders a turn around, because of the different circumstances.
    International impact
    The Chinese economy is today the second in the world, with a very strong weight in both sales and purchases in the world market. Therefore, in addition to the decline in the domestic market, this dynamic has a strong impact on the international economy as a whole.
    On the one hand, that of supply, because it stopped the external  industrial parts supply chain (or drastically decreased it), and led to a near paralysis: “the restrictions have affected the value chains of large companies such as vehicle manufacturers Nissan or Jaguar Land Rover, for example ”[5].
    On the other hand, that of demand, from countries where it bought food, raw materials and some industrial products. Those exports were one of the driving forces of those economies, like Brazil and Argentina.
    Last week, the São Paulo Stock Exchange fell 7%. This result reflected the impact on industrial companies of the lack of Chinese supplies in production chains, which affects Brazilian industrial exports (electronics and household appliances). “LG suspended the activities of its São Paulo plant in Taubaté for the next 10 days. The same happened with Motorola…. The business chamber of that sector (Abinee) reported that 57% of the associated companies have problems receiving imported materials”[6].
    It also impacts agricultural production: “José Ronaldo de Castro, argued that the coronavirus epidemic will affect Brazilian agricultural GDP, to the extent that external demand for meat is reduced.” It is a phenomenon that was registered in Argentina, where the export of the product fell 30% [7].
    “With limited growth in China, there will be fewer exports and that impacts large industrial conglomerates like Vale and Petrobras.” This Wednesday, both companies’ stocks suffered the impact: the shares of the Brazilian state oil company fell 9.47%; those of the Compañía Siderúrgica Nacional (steel industry) experienced a collapse of 10.66%. Airlines suffered the mos: GOL’s shares fell 15% and Azul’s almost 14% ”[8].
    Chinese government policy
    Once the worst part of the pandemic is over, and with the outbreak apparently under control, the Chinese government is taking two steps to recover the economy.                                                         First it will apply “stimulus” policies: “Expectations are that the world’s second economy will contract this quarter, for the first time in four decades, so it is anticipated that China will inject hundreds of billions of dollars in stimulus. The Politburo called for expanding the budget deficit, issuing more local and national bonds, reducing interest rates, delaying loan payments, reducing bottlenecks in the supply chain and increasing consumption. China should issue at least 2 trillion yuan ($ 282 billion dollars) in bonds to help the economy, said Robin Xing, Morgan Stanley economist “[9].
    Then, it would bet on a “rebound” effect of the economy itself, as it normalizes: “According to the latest official data, 95% of large companies and 60% of small and midsize companies outside Hubei, the most affected province, have already returned to work”[10].
    The perspectives
     
    This policy seems to produce the first results in some fields. “The most revealing thing about the Chinese recovery is the massive turnaround of large investment funds from Wall Street and London to the stock markets of the People’s Republic, via Hong Kong. In the last 10 days of February alone, Bloomberg, Barclay and JP Morgan Indices have received more than US $ 10.8 billion, with a total of the People’s Republic bond purchases (in Reminbi) that already exceed US $ 400 billion, and would double in 2021 ”[11].
    There are a number of forecasts about the immediate dynamics of the Chinese economy. Some are optimistic, such as those of the government itself, which expects for 2020 growth figures similar to 2019.
    “Official media cited experts who are optimistic about economic recovery in the coming months, including Liang Huang, chief economist at the China International Capital Corporation. Liang told the official nationalist Global Times, that “if the situation continues without complications, China is capable of achieving annual GDP growth of 6%” [12].
    This forecast is shared by several analysts and imperialist study centers. “The NBS calculation is that economic activity will offer a visible recovery at the end of March, with a second quarter that will have an increase of 4% / 5% per year, which would climb to 6.5% / 7% in the third, to recover the consumption boom in the second half of the year, that it experienced in 2019 ”[13].
    Others, on the contrary, have a pessimistic view. Something that begins with an assessment of the impact of the 2020 fall, and continues with an evaluation of GDP recovery possibilities for the rest of 2020. “Given the weak performance in the first two months of the year, Goldman Sachs bank revised its forecast for Chinese economy in the first quarter, from 2.5% growth to a 9% fall. For the year, the bank’s forecast decreased from a 5.5% to 3% growth”[14].
    Another analysis along the same lines: “There are those who predict a rebound, and that could happen in the industrial sector, but consumption has been lost. People are not going to start eating six times a day, and activities such as tourism are going to take a hit because vacations have disappeared.”[15]
    What can happen to world economy?
    In this framework of the possible dynamics of the Chinese economy, analysts also prepare forecasts for world economy. Business consultant McKinsey presents two alternative scenarios, in which “it differentiates between two scenarios: one where there is a rapid recovery, in which the virus is found to be seasonal, and by autumn governments have the tools to stop it; or a global slowdown, in which the virus is not seasonal and countries must maintain prevention measures even if they control the epidemic, as in the case of China ”[16].
    Besides a possible “natural recovery”, there is doubt about the impact that the “fiscal stimulus measures applied by governments may have.”The second key point is how governments will try to mitigate the impact of a crisis, since in recent ones, the response has been to cut interest rates to help companies and individuals pay their debts and stimulate demand, as the Bank of England did yesterday, leaving a very small margin to cut even more. Thus, governments would have to address the impact of the coronavirus through fiscal expansion, something very different from the recent past, although the impact is unclear”[17].
    The worst-case scenario forecast by UNCTAD (United Nations Conference on Trade and Development) is that “world economy would grow by only 0.5%, with a negative impact of $ 2 trillion of world GDP” [17]. In early March, the OECD (Organization for Economic Cooperation and Development) estimated 0.7, and the World Bank 1.2% [18]. All these institutions, which had already estimated low growth rates in January, have now reduced them.
    In reality, we are talking about the start of a global recession. World population grew in 2018 by 1,109 % [19]. In other words, based on that growth, the world economy is actually shrinking. A situation that can merge with the gigantic contradictions accumulated in decades and detonate them.
    Notes:
    [1] https://www.bbc.com/mundo/noticias-internacional-51916056
    [2] https://economia.uol.com.br/noticias/redacao/2020/03/19/impactos-economicos-coronavirus-china.htm
    [3] https://www.elmundo.es/economia/2015/10/19/562470fe22601dc45b8b4622.html
    [4] https://www.laverdad.es/economia/caida-economica-china-20200308131227-ntrc.html?ref=https:%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
    [5] See note [1].
    [6] https://www.lapoliticaonline.com/nota/124870-coronavirus-la-caida-de-la-economia-china-pego-en-brasil-y-preven-que-arrastre-a-argentina/
    [7] Idem.
    [8] Idem.
    [9] https://negocios.elpais.com.uy/noticias/china-prepara-medidas-estimulo-economico-remision-coronavirus.html
    [10] https://www.lavanguardia.com/economia/20200316/474193315948/china-economia-coronavirus-crisis-ventas-fabrica-empresas.html
    [11] https://agenciabrasil.ebc.com.br/internacional/noticia/2020-03/economia-da-china-esta-se-normalizando-apos-pico-de-coronavirus
    [12] See note [1].
    [13] https://www.clarin.com/economia/economia/recuperacion-china-abre-camino-superacion-crisis-global_0_0f_dAQy-k.html
    [14] See note [2].
    [15] https://www.laverdad.es/economia/caida-economica-china-20200308131227-ntrc.html?ref=https:%2F%2Fwww.google.com%2F
    [16] See note [1].
    [17] https://www.rankiapro.com/como-afecta-coronavirus-mercado-chino/
    [18] https://www.razon.com.mx/negocios/ocde-recorta-a-0-7-pronostico-de-crecimiento-para-mexico-en-2020/
    [19] https://datos.bancomundial.org/indicador/SP.POP.GROW
     

  • African Governments and COVID-19 Prevention: Hypocrisy and Irresponsibility

    April 5, 2020

    To start talking about prevention on the African continent, we must state a fact that overlaps everything and anything that is discussed. The most basic preventive measure and what has become a real slogan before the pandemic, washing hands, is already a requirement that may sound absurd to the ears of most Africans, given that data from the United Nations and the African Union find that in sub-Saharan Africa (that is, below the border established by the Sahara Desert and which corresponds to 85% of the continent’s territory), 63% of the population have not access to tap water.
    By: Wilson Honório da Silva, of the PSTU National Training Secretariat 
    That said, reading official press releases, mainly between February and mid-March, it is possible to find numerous diversified references to prevention measures proposed by different governments.
    Around March 17, for example, Mauritania imposed a mandatory curfew and closed cafes and restaurants; Nigeria closed schools and imposed a limit on religious events; Egypt banned large concentrations in public spaces and closed all educational centers and South Africa began to create similar restrictions, mainly prohibiting crowding in bars and leisure places.
    As from the 19th, many countries started to suspend cultural, sporting events or those gathering more than 100 people (including religious cults) and, a few, started to adopt policies of confinement of the population.
    But even before the numbers started to soar daily, especially from the 20th, many experts also warned of the ineffectiveness or sheer formality of much of what was being done. Mainly because, at that time, most countries prioritized the closing of their borders (mainly international flights), based on the fact that about 80% of the confirmed cases were foreigners or people who had returned to the country.
    As an example, on March 16, the South African government decreed the “State of Disaster”, determining that citizens of South Korea, countries in Europe and of USA would need to get visas to enter the country and canceled visas already granted to eight thousand travelers from China and Iran. In the same week, Algeria suspended sea and air routes with Europe; Morocco did the same with all international flights; while Liberia has banned visitors from countries where there are more than 200 cases of coronavirus, the same done by Kenya if there is at least one case.
    The worst mistake and what explains the speedy spread of the disease is not adopting (in practically any country) distancing measures, social isolation or confinement. In this sense, the most serious and regrettable example is South Africa, which only took these measures on March 27, when the reported cases had reached one thousand.
    The pandemic and the virus of Chinese capitalism in Africa
    As can be seen today, the closure of borders, although necessary, did not prevent the virus from infecting. And, by the way, by being the only measure taken, it sent a completely wrong message to the African population: that the coronavirus was “their” thing, having nothing to do with Africa.
    An idea reproduced to exhaustion on social networks and supported by “fake news” and unreasonable “theories”, such as that the virus would not resist African temperatures and climate. And, if that weren’t enough, it still ignited xenophobia, which is already a serious problem on the continent.
    As is known, conservative governments around the world (Trump’s and Bolsonaro’s ahead) have also worked with the idea of ​​the “foreign virus” or the “Chinese epidemic”, a racist nonsense to be rightly exposed.
    However, in the case of the African continent, there is a particularity that requires us to speak of the role of the Chinese in the spread of the virus: the fact that the Asian country is today one of the main, if not the most important, economic partner of the African countries, mainly Angola, South Africa, South Sudan, Namibia, Kenya and Rwanda.
    This was one of the factors that Bruce Basquet, a researcher at the University of Cape Town, highlighted when he referred (Science magazine, on March 15) to COVID-19 as a long-armed “time bomb” on African soil.
    A thesis that had already been discussed a month earlier by epidemiologist Marc Lipsitch, at Harvard University (USA), in an article in Nature, on February 13, that drew attention to the existing “possible transmission route” built “by the huge number of Chinese workers working in Africa and their travels between China and Africa,” remembering that most Chinese companies traditionally employ labor from the Asian country.
    To get an idea of ​​what we are talking about, according to a website dedicated to business in Africa with the significant name How we made in Africa, there were 10,000 Chinese companies in the continent in 2017 (90% of them of private capital, to the dismay of those who still believe in the litany of a “communist China”), with businesses in areas such as energy, civil construction, infrastructure, agribusiness, industry, commerce, services, and real estate.
    And it is worth mentioning some examples to understand not only the dimension of the problem but also because the imperialism’s puppet governments in Africa did not even think about taking more serious measures in relation to this.
    The mobile phones company Tecno (owned by China’s Transsion Holdings) controls 40% of the telephone market in East Africa. The Sunshine Group, based in Tanzania, does business across the continent, in areas such as heavy industry, agribusiness, and transportation. Star Times, which operates in the telecommunications field, is one of the main cable TV servers, with subsidiaries in thirty countries. Bobu Africa, on the other hand, is a tourism giant that specializes in “introducing African culture to Chinese tourists,” which are numbered in the hundreds of thousands each year.
    Late and ultra-limited measures
    Even when it was already evident that border closings and traffic restrictions were insufficient and cases of notification were already multiplying across the continent, there were many examples of irresponsible attitudes on the part of African governments. And one that best expresses how little Africans can expect from their governments is the infamous dictator Yoweri Museveno, who has presided over Uganda for 33 years, keeping the country (of almost 44 million inhabitants) plunged into a sea of ​​corruption, poverty, and unemployment.
    And in this case, by the way, the similarities with Bolsonaro are scary. Museveno is a member of a fundamentalist Christian organization (from the same branch of the Universal Kingdom of God, owned by the Brazilian Edir Macedo and, also, collateral of Israeli Zionism); in 2019, he defended the death penalty for LGBT people and keeps the country’s prisons filled with social and political activists.
    So it is no coincidence that Uganda’s president is one of the most irresponsible speakers in relation to the pandemic among African countries. In an interview with the newspaper The Guardian, on March 20, when there were no notifications of contagion (now there are already 33 cases), Atel Kagirita, appointed by the president for the fight against COVID-19, declared that the virus “will not be a big problem … if we can effectively stop local transmission”, insinuating that the cases would remain restricted to those brought from abroad.
    Faced with the inefficiency of governments, fake news proliferate
    And it is worth remembering that, in today’s world, frivolous postures by the “authorities” always have a by-product that also turns into objective problems in facing the situation: the fake news. Just to give an example, which started in South Africa but has spread across the continent, the lack of initiatives on the part of the government has caused the population to start adopting completely ineffective measures in relation to prevention.
    For example, WhatsApp broadcast lists were inundated with the most bizarre news, such as the one arguing that the virus is transmitted by beef, driving many to change their diet to be protected (which has skyrocketed fish consumption in many regions). Another “news” said that there was no need to worry because “a Palestinian scientist had already discovered the corona vaccine”. And one of the worst, shared by millions, presented an unusual healing recipe: “Corona can be cured by boiling eight tablespoons of garlic in six cups of water.”
    As a result of fear and despair in the face of what was seen around the world, fake news cannot be seen as examples of “popular ignorance” or anything like that. They are unfortunate reflections of the inertia, not to mention complete levity, of governments like in Uganda, which is far from being an isolated case. And the worst is that levity and neglect with the people will probably continue even when treatment is necessary.
    The worst is yet to come
    In The Guardian March 20 interview, the top Ugandan official in charge of pandemic response was even more “optimistic” facing the outbreak, stating that the government “doesn’t envisage having many cases [needing critical care] because we are putting all our efforts on prevention.”
    A statement that according to experts from the country itself is completely incompatible with reality, although Uganda, in fact, as Kagirita claimed, has experienced other epidemics. Ebola’s toll was 11 death and 28,000 infected in its last outbreak between 2014 and 2016.
    Experience aside, Prof Pauline Byakika, a specialist in infectious diseases at the Makerere University College of Health Sciences, was emphatic: “once the [coronavirus] gets here, was going to spread very fast,” due to of what she calls the “social environment” in most homes, due to poor hygiene and ventilation conditions: “They are about five or six people in a house with one or two windows. Before you know it the whole household is going to be sick.”
    Also ignoring this reality, Uganda’s Minister of Health, Janet Ruth Aceng, said she was confident with the possibility of addressing possible problems, stating that the country has “enough capacity beds, some ICU units and ventilation to handle a possible outbreak”. Another lie. It is unavoidable to know that the Ugandan government is relying primarily on the services of the National Reference Hospital in Mulago, which has 1,500 beds but only 60 ICU beds.
    Uganda, unfortunately, is not an isolated case on the continent. Neither in relation to carelessness when there were still few notifications nor to how African governments are preparing to face the pandemic, now that its spread is unquestionable.
    But the irresponsibility of local governments regarding the pandemic is far from being limited to what has (or has not) been done in recent weeks. The biggest problem is that Africans, as highlighted in the aforementioned Nature article, will face the pandemic with far more unfavorable conditions than the rest of the world, including Brazil.
    Not because, as racists imply, “in Africa it is like that.” But simply because, as we have seen, the clutches of capitalism there have always been particularly sharp and perverse, leaving deep marks and open wounds on the continent. Something particularly visible is its health system.
    And it is exactly these open wounds that make Africa an environment in which the coronavirus not only finds more favorable conditions to spread but also to cause more lethal and catastrophic effects.
     

  • Chernobyl fires threaten to unleash radiation

    Fires burn in Ukraine’s Chernobyl Exclusion Zone on April 10. (Volodymyr Shuvayev / Agence France-Presse / Getty Images)

    By HEATHER BRADFORD

    April 26 marks the 34th anniversary of Chernobyl, the worst nuclear disaster in history. By some estimates, the ruins of the Chernobyl reactor will remain highly radioactive for 20,000 years. Decades after the catastrophe, the dangers of radiation persist as forest fires rampage across the exclusion zone. The recent forest fires are only the latest in recent years to threaten the region with radioactive ash and smoke. This problem is compounded by the dual impacts of climate change and capitalist profit motives.

    The Chernobyl Nuclear Disaster occurred in the early morning of April 26th, 1986, when a safety check to test if the uranium 235-fueled reactors could remain cool during a power outage went catastrophically wrong. At the time, there were four graphite-moderated nuclear reactors at Chernobyl Nuclear Power Plant, with two more under construction.

    The reactors were situated two miles from Pripyat, a Soviet city of 50,000 people. Pripyat was constructed in 1970 with amenities such as quality schools, a supermarket, and sports stadium. The reactors were nine miles away from Chernobyl, a city of 12,000. In all, there were over 115,000 people living within an 18.6 mile radius of the power plant and five million people living in contaminated areas of Russia, Belarus, and Ukraine.

    During the fateful test, Reactor Four experienced a meltdown, resulting in two explosions that unleashed 400 times the radiation of the U.S. atomic bombing of Hiroshima. The accident shrouded 77,000 square miles of Europe and Eurasia in radiation.

    It took 10 days for emergency workers to extinguish the graphite-fueled fire, resulting in the deaths of 28 workers from acute radiation syndrome in the months immediately after the accident. Over 200,000 people were mobilized to clean up the disaster, exposing these liquidation workers to high levels of radiation. In all, 600,000 people in the Soviet Union were subsequently exposed to high levels of radiation, including radioactive isotopes such as iodine-131, plutonium-239, strontium-90, cesium-134, and cesium-137, which were unleashed during the explosion.

    As a result, there have been 20,000 thyroid cancer cases between 1991 and 2015 in people who were under the age of 18 at the time of the accident. About 115,000 people were evacuated in 1986 and another 220,000 people were later evacuated and resettled. A 30 kilometer (approximately 18.6 miles) exclusion zone was established around the reactor.

    In the immediate aftermath of the disaster, trees near the reactor died off, becoming what was called a “Red Forest” to denote the russet tone of dead pine. In the decades since, the exclusion zone has become a refuge for returned wildlife and a collection of desolate ghost towns slowly vanishing into the overgrown forest.

    The cautionary tale of Chernobyl does not end with the return of nature or the story of countless generations tasked with stewardship over the sarcophagus encased Reactor Four. Recent wildfires threaten to release Chernobyl’s radiation. According to NASA Earth Observatory, wildfires in the exclusion zone began in early April, and firefighters have been working to put out the blaze since April 4. The impacted areas include Denysovets, Kotovsky, and Korogodsky forests.

    On April 8, the fires blew towards Kiev, which is located about 60 miles to the south. On April 9, people were evacuated from the village of Poliske. Poliske is a sparsely inhabited village located within the exclusion zone. A few hundred people, mostly elderly women in their 70s or 80s, reside illegally within the exclusion zone. According to BBC News, conflict in the Donbass region has sent some families to seek safety in the area just outside of the exclusion zone, where the housing is the cheapest in Ukraine. The New York Times stated that as of Saturday, April 11, 400 firefighters had been deployed to the area and 8600 acres had burned the previous week. The article further mentioned that the blaze has increased radiation levels in Russia and Belarus.

    Live Science reported that the fire is near the abandoned village of Vladimirovka. According to Ukraine’s Ecological Inspection Service, radiation readings near the blaze are 2.3 microsievert per hour. Typically, the exclusion zone’s ambient radiation is .14 microsievert per hour and .5 microsievert per hour is the threshold considered safe for humans. This calls into question the safety of firefighters working to extinguish the blaze as well as the people living in the region.

    At the moment, fires are not located near the entombed reactor. However, uranium-238, cesium-137 and other radionuclides were jettisoned from Reactor Four and have since been absorbed by vegetation and dirt. Fires can unleash these from the environment, and ash condenses the radionuclides sequestered within vegetation. NASA Earth Observatory stated that smoke plumes can carry radiation long distances and that the severity of wildfires has only increased over the years. According to a study published in Ecological Monographs by Timothy Mousseau of University of South Carolina, wildfires that broke out in 2002, 2008, 2010 redistributed 8% of cesium-137 released by the original Chernobyl disaster. Wildfires in 2015 came a mere 12 to 15 miles from Chernobyl’s reactors.

    The most recent wildfire has been attributed to local farming practices, wherein fields are burned in spring and fall. While this may contribute to fires, climate change is certainly the main culprit. A report released by the Atlantic Council in January 2020 noted that the 2019-2020 winter in Ukraine was mild with little snowfall. According to the report, 2019 was the warmest year on record for Kiev and the yearly average temperature in Ukraine was 2.9 degrees Celsius higher than average. In 2019, 36 temperature records were broken. Last year, there was 25% less precipitation than average. Droughts have nearly doubled over the last 20 years in Ukraine. In 2015, an article in The New York Times anticipated increased wildfires in the exclusion zone due to drier conditions. Likewise, in 2015 New Scientist reported that the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC) predicted more fires near Chernobyl in the future.

    Although climate change driven droughts are one of the catalysts for the fires, radiation itself contributes to the problem. Radiation slows the decay of leaf litter and inhibits growth of microorganisms, which creates more fuel for fires. In the absence of people, forests have expanded, which also generates more combustible material. The danger is amplified by the fact that local firefighters have seven times fewer crews and equipment than elsewhere in Ukraine. The IPCC predicted a similar outcome for Fukushima, Japan, which also has significant forests. They also posited that there is no threshold of radiation with zero effect. Climate change driven draughts, expanded forests, slow decay, few local resources, and strained water resources to fight fires create a recipe for disaster.

    Behind the climate crisis is capitalism itself. All manner of environmental problems can be traced back to the profit motive in capitalism. The drive for lower wages, unsafe working conditions, fewer environmental regulations, the endless creation of waste, the lack of storage for the waste created, the generation of pollution itself, the shuttling of hazardous production and wastes to the third world and oppressed communities, the anarchy of too much production, and the insatiable need for growth are all connected to endless drive for profits. Therefore, sustainability and safety are anathema to capitalism.

    In the context of the Chernobyl exclusion zone, logging trees within the exclusion zone garners tens of millions of dollars in profits. Since 2004, limited amounts of timber can be cut from the exclusion zone as long as it is scanned for radiation. Some 90% of this timber is used for furniture. According to a January 2020 article in Al Jazeera, fires within the exclusion zone are started purposefully to justify the sale of timber. In a report released after the 2015 wildfires, Mykola Tomenko, head of Ukraine’s parliamentary environmental commission, stated that fires can conceal illegal logging. Two-thirds of illegal profits derived from the exclusion zone are from timber. In 2007, state inspectors also found radiation contaminated charcoal sold in Ukrainian supermarkets. While the more recent fires have not been connected to the timber industry, the search for profits brings capitalists to the radioactive wilds of the exclusion zone to extract resources without regard for the impact on consumers or the threat of unleashed radiation.

    The Chernobyl nuclear accident is a horror story in the closing chapter of the Soviet Union. It is a tale that will last for thousands of years, written in elements with the potential to outlive humanity. If there is a moral of the story, it is that nuclear power is dangerous. Despite the threats, however, there is little motive within capitalism to mitigate the dangers. The only motive, as always, is the profit motive.

    Fires will certainly revisit Chernobyl and potentially visit Fukushima, once again spreading radiation. Beyond Chernobyl, wildfires have threatened the Hanford Site, a former nuclear production facility in Washington State several times. In 2000, the Department of Energy declared an emergency when fires neared a building where nuclear waste was stored. In 2017, a wildfire burned part of the Hanford Site, though no buildings were threatened. Again, in 2019, wildfires burned more than 40,000 acres near the site. The Hanford Nuclear Waste Site is the largest nuclear waste dump in the U.S. and contains 56 million gallons of radioactive waste.

    The danger of aging nuclear reactors in the United States, the question of where nuclear waste is stored, the connection to terrifying weapons of war, and the catastrophic consequences when things go awry are just a few of the many reasons why nuclear energy must be nationalized and ultimately abolished.

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

  • U.S. capitalist politics: ‘Fool them and rule them’

    Democratic Party contenders Joe Biden and Bernie Sanders share a fist bump before their “debate” on March 15, 2020. (CNN)

    By ANDY BARNS

    Capitalism in many parts of the globe relies very heavily on repressive police forces and open government terrorism. Activists in countries like Sudan, Russia, UAE, Syria, Iraq, Libya, Brazil, China, etc, are routinely abducted and interrogated (tortured), while protest movements are treated with extreme, almost military responses.

    While these aspects of ruling-class repression do occur in the United States, it is a much more sporadic process (notable examples of police terrorism do exist, such as the 1985 MOVE bombings). The U.S. ruling class never needed these things in excess in order to operate with impunity. It has a perfect means to maintain control of the domestic working class—the put-up job commonly referred to as “politics.” Put another way, the two-party system, along with the orbiting cloud of news media, is all that is needed to maintain control, so long as the domestic working class continues to believe in its sincerity.

    Obviously, the drama of partisan politics has at least some real basis. There are real interests being fought over, even including issues that are in the interests of the working class and oppressed. But whenever the real interests of the workers are being haggled over (i.e. health-care needs), it’s kept within the confines of the needs of the political party championing it, usually the good-cop “Democratic” Party. Once the party’s needs are met electorally, these lofty aims are quickly pigeonholed. As for the rest of policy, its usually a fight between two sets of robber barons over the spoils of the ruling-class offensive against the workers, which has been ongoing for over 50 years.

    The ruling-class propaganda war

    The true power of the U.S. political system, for capitalism’s sake, is its duel psychological effect on the workers. First, the two-party system (and news based on topics of debate confined to the two-party system) tricks most Americans into thinking there are only two polar opinions in the U.S., “liberal” and “conservative.” But these categories are, truth be told, very similar in historical context. With the exception of culture wars surrounding human rights (anti-racism, gendered emancipation, democratic representation, immigrants rights, etc.), all of the mainstream political spectrums always agree on matters that are integral to capitalism, including the necessity of U.S. imperial dominance over much of the world through its military spending and bombing operations.

    Nonetheless, the delimitation between “liberal and “conservative” forces all manner of social and political concerns into two neat, easy-to-control boxes. The message that the partisan media blasts out is loud and clear: “There are Americans who do not share your values or who don’t think what you think. They are clearly bad people. Or, they don’t have the intelligence that you do. They must be stopped at all costs.” All nuance, and thus all possibility to learn from another perspective and really grow, vanishes under the weight of many thousands of assumptions such as these.

    This war drum is always beating loudly every election season. The options: a party for the rule of the capitalists who favor white supremacy and the rolling back of human rights for a large minority of American workers, or a party for the rule of the capitalists who tell you they care about democracy and equality but only when the other party is in power.

    Regardless, the U.S. working class is still in the same place it was four years previously, trapped in a machine made for the profitability of capital, barreling towards ecological collapse, and with perhaps more, or less, respect for marginalized groups. But, so the electoral narrative goes, you must make a choice or your evildoer neighbors will make it for you.

    A certain depoliticization of the workers has occurred, in which average working people often forget that they have interests or demands separate from the ruling rich who run in the elections (Bloomberg spent nearly a billion dollars to simply be admitted to “Democratic” Party “debates”!).

    Proletarian depoliticization occurs because large numbers of working people are still trapped in the lie that this is the only kind of politics. “Liberal” and “conservative” may be useful terms, but in this context they are ruling-class tools of division. The political system will never tell you about the struggle of the toiler against the exploiter, of poor against rich, the worker against capitalist.

    Continued interest in the next election does not aid the working class or augment their revolutionary potential. It’s just a ploy. Provided that the U.S. working class never unites around a broad program of social uplifting for its class, the rulers need never fear a revolution. Breaking completely with the political lie machine and building solidly proletarian politics is the only way the U.S. working class will ever gain political power and free itself from the madness of this system.

    Bernie Sanders and the left

    This brings us neatly to the U.S. socialist left—portions of which are doing the exact opposite of this! It is difficult to see how any party with revolutionary pretensions could make the mistake of asking workers to support a political candidate of the capitalist lie machine.

    While still in the running for the Democratic Party ticket, Bernie Sanders gained a lot of popularity for his “democratic socialist” ideals. The popularity that Sanders gained is clear evidence that the U.S. working class is beginning to wake up, but it would be a mistake to assume that supporting Sanders was, or still is, a viable option for working people.

    The reason? Bernie Sanders was not fighting for the political power of the working class verses the exploiting class. He was, and still is, a reformist—that is, an advocate of basic but limited reforms of the current system. He is running to attain the highest office of a machine built for profitable exploitation and which is barreling towards ecological collapse—the U.S. capitalist state. Essentially, this is not working-class power in action, but a concession to the workers while inducing them to remain idle and content in this illogical machine.

    It is here that the notion of slowly graduating towards a socialist future comes up. And it’s not a new idea that people on the left should use the political lie machine to tactically attain some beneficial things. But why demonstrate to a working class growing more and more frustrated with political elites that you are on the side of the elites and that you are foolish enough to believe them?

    Should socialists struggle for positive reforms? Absolutely! But there are ways to do this that are potentially revolutionary, and other ways that are limited, reformist, and apt to lead to a dead end. The revolutionary way is to pressure and force the politicians and employers by way of mass action, strikes, and civil disobedience to adopt the program we want—and if we don’t get it, raise more hell! Socialists, by taking part in ongoing struggles can help the working class to discover the power they have, right now, to take the offensive towards the elites! In other words, the proletariat can learn that they are revolutionary!

    The dead-end way to achieve reforms, on the other hand, is to do exactly what too many would-be socialists in the U.S. do now: support candidates who are good with lefty buzz words on the Democratic ticket and hope they don’t forget their “radicalism” the instant they sit in office. Never mind the concrete resistance of anti-socialism in the political process, meant very purposefully to shut this kind of thing down. Never mind the likes of Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a darling of the liberal media, who passively supported the right-wing coup against the government in Bolivia [1]! Such “progressive” politicians, like their supporters in the ostensible “revolutionary” left, do not actually know what the word socialism means.

    Socialism is international. Socialism is proletarian. Socialism demands justice for the whole of humanity. Socialism is not something the poor wait for the politicians to implement for them. Socialism does not work to bolster the parties of capitalism!

    It has also been stated, although less frequently, that the U.S. ruling class is afraid of people like Sanders. The rich believe that, had Sanders won and implemented his reformist policies, their privileges would likely have been curtailed. (Thus, they use their media empires to try to trick the working class with lies about how socialism is opposed to freedom. Don’t forget America has the single largest mass incarceration system in the world, which uses forced labor.).

    Bernie Sanders is like giving the ruling class “a bad day.” But that’s not good enough. People can recover from a bad day. They cannot recover from the apocalypse. As revolutionaries, we should want to bring the ruling class its apocalypse, which can only occur if the entire foundation of its rule is smashed! That would require the revolutionary action of the workers to overcome this domination and establish their own rule, focused on fulfilling their needs. The U.S. political machine is designed to filter this possibility away, like the security at a rich men’s club quietly escorting an unwanted wage worker off the premises so as not to bother the “esteemed guests”!

    The cause of revolution in the United States demands action by working people and their allies who have broken with the U.S. political system so integral to the cause of capitalism, and who set about to build a workers’ party with a revolutionary program capable of bringing the working class to power. The mere notion of forging a democratic movement against the system will bring many of the 100 million non-voters in the United States to our side. The less time and effort that are spent on the political lie machine can be spent on realizing the revolutionary potential that exists all around us, and with it, a world of actualized freedom and mutual respect, and a democratic economy based on the needs of the human race, not stock portfolios.

    [1] Ocasio-Cortez to Constituents on Bolivian Coup: Drop Dead – CounterPunch.org

     

     

  • ¿Cuales son los origenes de la propiedad privada?

    Escrito por Carlos Sapir
    ¿Cuál es el origen de la propiedad privada? La propiedad privada la encontramos por todas partes en el mundo capitalista, pero las relaciones que tenemos con la propiedad privada no son simples. Un inquilino vive diariamente en su apartamento, lo limpia, amuebla y paga la renta cada mes, pero nada de lo que él hace lo acerca para que llegue a ser el dueño del apartamento. Bajo el capitalismo, el apartamento seguirá siendo propiedad del casa-teniente quién puede tener miles de departamentos, y quién nunca haber puesto un pie en el apartamento porque él emplea otras personas para que le administren toda su propiedad.
    Un típico dueño de casa tampoco tiene una situación diferente a la del inquilino: para poder comprar su casa, tuvo que pedir un préstamo a un banco, y al final tendrá que pagar al banco incluso una suma de dinero mucho más grande que el precio original de la casa. Si en cualquier momento falla en pagarle al banco la cuota de la casa, el banco iniciara el proceso para quitársela y podrá llamar a la policía para reclamar su dominio sobre la casa. No importa que los dueños del banco no necesiten la casa, no importa que nunca la hayan visto, y que posiblemente ni siquiera sepan que exista esa casa a la hora que sus empleados están organizando el desalojo. Nada de esto cambiara la decisión de los policías de cumplir con las leyes de hierro de la propiedad privada bajo el capitalismo. Pero cómo fue que llegamos a estar en esta situación tan absurda?
    A los capitalistas les gustaría que nosotros creyéramos que la propiedad privada fue creada por el genio de unos cuantos individuos: según esta lógica, el dueño de su apartamento tuvo la idea de construir un complejo de departamentos antes que usted, y por eso él es el dueño y usted el inquilino. Pero esta es una lógica falsa. Nosotros como socialistas necesitamos entender la propiedad privada (tanto como todos los otros elementos de la sociedad) como el producto de un proceso histórico: por esta razón necesitamos estudiar los orígenes del capitalismo cómo sistema económico mundial para entender cómo funciona la propiedad privada hoy en día.
    El capitalismo fue el resultado de un sistema económico anterior llamado feudalismo. En la Europa precapitalista de la Edad Media, los reyes y el resto de la nobleza se adueñaban de lo que querían usando la fuerza militar, organizando ejércitos, para tomar posesión de todo lo que pudieran. Los campesinos que vivían en su tierra fueron extorsionados por los reyes de su época, que demandaban tributos a cambio de su “protección”, pero recursos naturales tales como los campos de caza y el agua potable se compartían de manera bastante libre entre los campesinos. A través del tiempo, una clase de comerciantes, distinta de la nobleza y los campesinos, se fueron apoderando de esos recursos y fueron utilizados por la nobleza para el intercambio de recursos con otros países. Los comerciantes (y eventualmente hasta la nobleza) se dieron cuenta de que podían extraer más riqueza de los campesinos si tomaban control de la tierra común campesina para su uso privado, y solicitaron a los reyes la autoridad para hacerlo, prometiéndoles que a cambio ellos le darían una porción del lucro. Los campesinos que habían perdido su tierra de la que antes vivían, no tuvieron más opción que vender su fuerza de trabajo a los que ahora eran los nuevos propietarios privados de la tierra de la que fueron desalojados por la fuerza. Los campesinos fueron las víctimas en este proceso, pero en muchos casos hicieron rebeliones como respuesta a los ataques de los nuevos dueños. Los nuevos dueños respondieron con violencia brutal para aplacar a los campesinos. Este proceso violento de privatización de la tierra es lo que se llama la acumulación primitiva. Así, mientras que los campesinos despojados no tuvieron más alternativa que vender su fuerza de trabajo para sobrevivir, los nuevos usurpadores de la tierra les pagaban a los nuevos proletarios escasamente lo necesario para subsistir por el producto de su trabajo mientras los nuevos patrones se quedaban con la mayor parte del lucro. Con el capital que podían acumular luego lo podían reinvertir en otros negocios y empresas. Este sistema de explotación y reinversión de parte de los nuevos dueños de la tierra llego a ser el proyecto original del capitalismo y que rige en los días de hoy.
    Con el progreso de acumulación primitiva en Europa, la tierra fue encuadrada en lotes privados, y el capitalismo pronto empezó a quedarse sin tierra para continuar su expansión. Como respuesta, los comerciantes y reyes de Europa empezaron a financiar expediciones de colonización en busca de nuevas tierras para explotar. Los indígenas del continente americano tenían varios y diversos sistemas económicos sobre los cuales organizaban sus relaciones con la tierra y sus sociedades. A los conquistadores europeos, esto no les importo cuando llegaron a América. Los colonizadores europeos, y más tarde, los países que surgieron de las colonias que se independizaron del yugo colonial europeo como los Estados Unidos, Canadá, Brasil etc. Lanzaron y siguen lanzando guerras de genocidio contra los indígenas para arrebatar sus tierras. Después de ser conquistada o arrebatada, la tierra se vendía a empresarios y colonos. Aunque la podían vender nuevamente, la venta no cambiaba el origen del nuevo orden legal que permitió la posesión y venta de la tierra sobre la base del genocidio. En lo que hoy se llama California, la tierra que primero fue robada por los españoles a los indígenas, fue robada de nuevo por los estadounidenses. Este proceso de conquistas bárbaras sigue hoy, por ejemplo con el robo de tierra de los Wet’suwet’en en Canadá para el beneficio de las empresas de petróleo, o con el robo de tierra de varios grupos de indígenas en la frontera de los Estados Unidos y México para la construcción del muro fronterizo de Trump.
    El proceso “legal” de la posesión y venta de vienes privados se ha edificado y se ha construido sobre la premisa de violencia bruta contra los desposeídos. Y no es solo una cuestión de historia, la violencia sigue siendo la primera (y muchas veces la única) respuesta del estado capitalista contra cualquiera que se atreva a cuestionar la “justicia” del sistema de propiedad privada. Cuando el colectivo de Moms (madres por el alojamiento, un grupo organizado de madres desalojadas en Oakland), trató de recuperar una casa desocupada, el gobierno mandó todo un batallón de policías con fusiles y tanques para desalojarlos. Solo fue gracias a la respuesta enorme de solidaridad del pueblo de Oakland, en contra de esta agresión, que les dieron a las mamás la oportunidad de participar en el sistema de propiedad privada y comprar la casa. Solo a través de movimientos militantes de masas podemos hacer frente a las fuerzas del estado que protegen a los monopolizadores de la propiedad privada. Los capitalistas pueden apelar a la civilidad y el imperio de la ley todo que quieran, pero al final lo dijo mejor el anarquista Jean-Pierre Proudhon: “toda la propiedad es un robo”
     

Salir de la versión móvil